Data Warehousing
We design, modernise and maintain the enterprise data platforms organisations rely on every day, at a pace that makes business sense rather than starting again from nothing.
A structured look at your architecture, your data model and how the platform is maintained. You get a written view of what is making change expensive and what the options are.
The Client’s Situation
Built room by room, without a blueprint
Clients rarely arrive describing an architecture problem. They arrive with a symptom. A report that is needed. A load that runs slowly. A table that has grown too large. A number that does not look right.
As organisations grow, the data warehouse tends to evolve like a building extended room by room without a proper blueprint. New systems, new integrations and new reporting needs add complexity until simple changes become expensive projects. Pipelines multiply, information gets duplicated, while business rules become difficult to maintain. Ownership, standards and maintenance processes were never established, because there was never a moment at which anyone decided to establish them.
We design warehouses that hold up when the source systems change, the volumes grow and the definitions are argued over.
What changes when the platform has a design
The point of the work is to make the platform something the business can change safely, rather than something it works around.
Change stops being a project
Simple changes stay simple, instead of becoming expensive work because nobody can predict what they will affect.
The platform has an owner
Ownership, standards and maintenance processes are defined, so when a pipeline fails it is clear who acts.
One meaning per thing
Duplicated information and unmaintainable business rules get resolved, so two reports stop disagreeing about the same number.
The trade-off becomes a decision
You see both the budget-conscious option and the best-practice one, so any compromise is chosen rather than inherited.
Stable after go-live, not just at it
Solutions validate their inputs and handle errors, are tested before business users see them, and are monitored closely once live.
What the work covers
1
Data modelling
Designing how information is structured so meaning stays consistent as the platform grows.
2
Frameworks design and implementation
Building the reusable structures that pipelines and processes are made from, rather than solving each case separately.
3
Monitoring design and implementation
Making pipeline performance, failures and execution trends visible rather than discovered.
4
Data solution architecture
Designing how the parts fit together, and correcting architectures that have outgrown their original design.
5
Business analysis
Establishing what the business actually needs from the data before the structure is built around it.
6
Data quality assurance
Validating inputs, handling errors, and checking that what arrives is what was expected.
Turn your data into a competitive advantage.
Whether you’re trying to prove marketing performance, modernise enterprise reporting, or build a stronger data strategy, we’ll help you create analytics that deliver measurable business value.
Two options, and the choice is yours
Discovery and analysis
We establish what exists before proposing anything: the architecture, the model, the pipelines, and how the platform is actually maintained day to day.
Two options, not one recommendation
We recommend at least two ways forward — a budget-friendly approach and a best-practice solution. This lets you balance the immediate business need against long-term maintainability, which matters most when delivery is urgent and the temptation is to decide quickly.
Build for the awkward cases
Implementation focuses on solutions that are robust but flexible. Handling different scenarios, validating inputs, and managing errors properly rather than assuming the happy path.
Test, document, then deploy together
The solution is tested before business users are involved. On acceptance, we prepare documentation and deploy. Deployment usually needs coordination across several teams, so we manage the communication, the expectations and the rollout rather than handing over a release note.
Watch it closely once it is live
After go-live, we monitor the solution to confirm it is stable and to resolve issues quickly, while attention is still on the change.
How we work depends on whether we are leading the project or working as outsourced consultants inside your delivery team. The sequence below describes the outsourced engagement, which is the more common of the two.
Data & Analytics
Why organisations bring us in
Start with what is already there
If changes to your data platform have started costing more than they should, an assessment will establish why. You get a written view of the architecture as it stands, what is driving the cost of change, and at least two ways forward with the trade-offs made explicit.
What do our clients say?
Want to hear more from us?
For insights and updates straight your inbox. No spam, unsubscribe at any time.
Questions we are asked
What do you need from us to get started?
Access to the systems and whatever documentation exists, and time with the people who maintain the platform and the people who depend on its output. The second matters more than clients expect. Much of what a data warehouse actually does is understood by individuals rather than written down.
What will you need from us during the project?
Decisions, mainly. Where we recommend two options, someone has to choose between them. Beyond that: availability from your technical team for questions that come up, and business users for testing before a change goes live.
How long will the project take?
It depends on what the discovery finds, which is why we do not quote a duration before it. Engagements range from a few months for a defined piece of work to several years for platform modernisation that has to happen while the platform stays in service.
Who should we include from our teams?
The people who own the source systems, the people who maintain the warehouse, and at least one business stakeholder who can say what the output is for. Deployment usually needs coordination across several teams, so it helps to identify those teams early rather than at rollout.
How often should we meet?
Regularly enough that surprises surface as questions rather than as problems. The rhythm depends on the pace of the work, and we would rather agree it with you at kick-off than impose a standard cadence.
Should we modernise what we have, or rebuild it?
Usually modernise. A warehouse that the business relies on daily is difficult to replace without disruption, and the case for rebuilding is often weaker than it first appears once the real cost of migration is understood. That said, this is exactly the kind of question the two-option recommendation exists to answer properly, with the actual numbers in front of you.
Start with what is already there
If changes to your data platform have started costing more than they should, an assessment will establish why. You get a written view of the architecture as it stands, what is driving the cost of change, and at least two ways forward with the trade-offs made explicit.
London Office
51 Lime Street
c/o HCR Law LLP
London EC3M 7DQ
United Kingdom
Zagreb Office
Centar 2000
Radnicka cesta 37a
10000 Zagreb
Croatia
Tell us what the platform is running on and what has become difficult. A consultant who works on platforms like yours will come back to you.
"*" indicates required fields